
Contents
Author’s reasoning about communication theory Emolla for a General Audience Emolla for a Professional Audience How Communication Theory Shaped the Brand Sources
Communication Theory as a Framework for Design

Communication theory provides a way to understand design not only as a system of visual forms, but as a process of meaning-making between people, objects, and contexts. In this project, communication is approached as an active, dynamic process rather than a linear transmission of information from sender to receiver. Within contemporary communication studies, communication is often conceptualized as a transactional process: meanings are continuously produced, interpreted, and adjusted through interaction. This perspective is especially important for design practice, where objects, visuals, and interfaces do not simply «deliver» messages, but participate in shaping emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses. Design, therefore, can be understood as a communicative environment that structures how people experience, interpret, and reflect on their own states and actions.

Emolla for a General Audience
Emolla is a brand created for people who experience emotional tension and seek a safe and accessible way to express and process their feelings. The brand addresses everyday stress, anxiety, and emotional overload that often remain unspoken or unresolved within social interaction.
At the core of Emolla lies the idea that any emotion is legitimate and deserves acknowledgment. Rather than encouraging emotional suppression or control, the brand proposes an alternative approach: learning to experience emotions consciously and safely.


Emolla for a Professional Audience
From a professional perspective, Emolla can be understood as a brand system designed to mediate emotional communication through material and visual means. The brand does not aim to verbalize emotions directly; instead, it constructs a communicative environment that enables expression, containment, and reflection.


How Communication Theory Shaped the Brand
Communication theory shaped the development of the Emolla brand not by defining a set of messages to be communicated, but by influencing how communication itself was conceptualized within the project. Rather than treating communication as transmission, the brand was designed around the idea of communication as a process of meaning-making that unfolds over time. This perspective informed the decision to shift emotional communication away from verbal articulation and interpersonal exchange toward mediated, intrapersonal interaction. Emotional experience was understood as something that does not always require verbalization or an external interlocutor. Instead, communication was approached as a self-directed process supported by material and visual tools. From this standpoint, Emolla was designed as a communicative environment rather than a message-driven brand. Objects, interaction scenarios, and reflective practices were treated as components of a system that enables expression, observation, and reinterpretation of emotional states. Communication theory thus functioned as a framework for structuring experience, not for prescribing content.
The emphasis on process also led to the integration of feedback and reflection into the brand logic. Emotional expression was not considered complete without the possibility of returning to it, observing it over time, and recognizing change. This understanding informed the inclusion of structured reflective elements that allow communication to continue beyond a single interaction. Semiotic principles further influenced the brand by encouraging indirect and metaphorical modes of communication. Rather than naming emotions explicitly, Emolla relies on visual and material cues that invite interpretation. This indirectness reduces emotional intensity and preserves openness, allowing users to assign their own meanings without constraint. Finally, communication theory highlighted the importance of communicative safety. Emotional communication was treated as a potentially vulnerable process that can be inhibited by evaluation and social risk. By removing external judgment and positioning objects as neutral mediators, the brand creates conditions in which emotional expression becomes less performative and more immediate. In this way, communication theory did not function as a layer added after the brand was designed. Instead, it shaped the logic through which the brand was constructed, influencing how interaction, meaning, and experience were organized within the project.
Conclusion
This project demonstrates how communication theory can be applied to brand design not as an abstract framework, but as a practical tool for structuring interaction, meaning, and experience. By approaching communication as a process rather than a message, the Emolla brand translates theoretical insights into tangible design decisions. Through the use of mediated, non-verbal, and intrapersonal communication, Emolla creates conditions for safe emotional expression and reflection. The brand does not attempt to control or prescribe emotional outcomes; instead, it enables users to engage in their own communicative processes, assigning meaning to emotional experience through interaction with objects and practices. The project illustrates that design can function as a communicative environment that shapes how emotions are expressed, interpreted, and regulated. In this sense, Emolla serves as an example of how communication theory can inform design practice at multiple levels, from conceptual framing to everyday user interaction, without becoming explicit or instructional.
Communication Theory: Bridging Academia and Practice // edu.hse.ru URL: https://edu.hse.ru/course/view.php?id=133853 (accessed 10.12.2025).
Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00166.x (accessed 10.12.2025).
Griffin, E., Ledbetter, A., & Sparks, G. (2019). A first look at communication theory (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Theories of human communication (11th ed.). Waveland Press.
Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (2011). Pragmatics of human communication. W. W. Norton & Company.
Berger, C. R. (2014). Interpersonal communication. De Gruyter Mouton. Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. (2016). Nonverbal communication. Routledge.
McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT Press.
(Original work published 1964).
Coombs, W. T. (2015). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Butusova K. Educational project «emolla» [Electronic resource]. — Available at: https://hsedesign.ru/project/5c41b7b104b149b390c6d2a0225ad1b2 (accessed 10.12.2025).
Butusova K. Educational project «emolla» [Electronic resource]. — Available at: https://hsedesign.ru/project/cb9211edc6f44fb1b5a46444be0a8fa7 (accessed 10.12.2025).